Telnyx vs Twilio: Complete Comparison for Business Voice & SMS (2026)
Telnyx and Twilio are two of the most popular cloud communications platforms, but they take fundamentally different approaches. Twilio is the dominant market leader with the largest developer ecosystem. Telnyx is the infrastructure-first challenger that owns its own network. This comparison covers everything you need to know to choose between them in 2026 — including the things other comparison articles leave out.
Company Overview
Twilio
Founded in 2008, Twilio is a publicly traded company (NYSE: TWLO) that pioneered the CPaaS (Communications Platform as a Service) category. They went public in 2016, acquired SendGrid (email) in 2019 and Segment (customer data) in 2020. As of 2026, Twilio generates over $4 billion in annual revenue and serves millions of developers worldwide.
Twilio doesn't own telecommunications infrastructure. They resell carrier capacity — primarily through Bandwidth in the US — and add their API layer, developer tools, and ecosystem on top. Their value proposition is developer experience and breadth of features, not lowest-cost routing.
Telnyx
Founded in 2009, Telnyx is a privately held company that has taken a fundamentally different approach: building and operating its own global IP network. Telnyx has private points of presence (PoPs) across North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia, connected by a private backbone. They are a licensed carrier in multiple countries.
This infrastructure ownership is Telnyx's core differentiator. By eliminating the middleman markup that Twilio pays to carriers, Telnyx can offer significantly lower rates — particularly on voice and international routes.
Pricing Comparison
Voice Rates by Country
| Route | Twilio | Telnyx | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 US Outbound | $0.017/min | $0.009/min | 47% |
| 🇺🇸 US Inbound | $0.0085/min | $0.0035/min | 59% |
| 🇬🇧 UK Outbound | $0.044/min | $0.015/min | 66% |
| 🇬🇧 UK Inbound | $0.0085/min | $0.005/min | 41% |
| 🇦🇺 AU Outbound | $0.079/min | $0.020/min | 75% |
| 🇦🇺 AU Inbound | $0.0085/min | $0.005/min | 41% |
| 🇮🇱 IL Outbound | $0.090/min | $0.020/min | 78% |
| 🇮🇱 IL Inbound | $0.0085/min | $0.006/min | 29% |
SMS Rates (US)
| Type | Twilio | Telnyx | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outbound SMS | $0.0079 | $0.004 | + carrier surcharges on both |
| Inbound SMS | $0.0079 | $0.004 | + carrier surcharges on both |
| Outbound MMS | $0.02 | $0.015 | 25% savings on Telnyx |
| Inbound MMS | $0.01 | $0.008 | 20% savings on Telnyx |
Important caveat on US SMS: Both providers add carrier surcharges (AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon each charge differently). Telnyx's per-carrier fees are slightly different from Twilio's, and on some carriers (T-Mobile, Verizon), Telnyx can actually be marginally more expensive. The base rate is lower, but total cost depends on your carrier mix.
Phone Number Costs
Both charge $1.00-$1.50/month for US local numbers. Toll-free numbers are $2.00/month on both platforms. International number pricing varies but is generally comparable.
Network Architecture
This is the most fundamental difference between the two companies and affects everything from pricing to reliability.
Twilio: Reseller Model
Twilio does not own telecommunications infrastructure. For US traffic, they primarily use Bandwidth as their underlying carrier. For international traffic, they work with various local carriers. Twilio's value is in the software layer — APIs, developer tools, and the ecosystem they've built on top of carrier infrastructure.
This means Twilio's costs have a floor: whatever their carriers charge them, plus their margin. They can't fundamentally undercut carrier pricing because they're a customer of those carriers.
Telnyx: Infrastructure Owner
Telnyx built its own private IP network with points of presence in major data centers worldwide. They peer directly with carriers rather than buying wholesale minutes. This gives them more control over call quality, routing, and — critically — cost structure.
The downside of owning infrastructure is that you're responsible for maintaining it. When things go wrong, you can't just blame the upstream carrier.
Voice Quality
In standard conditions, both platforms deliver excellent voice quality for US domestic calls. The differences emerge in edge cases:
- International calls: Telnyx generally offers better quality on international routes because traffic stays on their private network longer before hitting the PSTN. Twilio's international quality depends on which carrier they're routing through.
- High-concurrency calls: Both handle high concurrency well, but Telnyx's elastic SIP trunking is purpose-built for scaling voice traffic.
- Codec support: Both support G.711 and Opus. Telnyx supports a wider range of codecs for SIP trunking use cases.
SMS Deliverability
For US A2P messaging, deliverability is largely determined by your 10DLC registration and trust score rather than the provider. Both Twilio and Telnyx submit to the same TCR (The Campaign Registry) system.
Where differences exist:
- Twilio has deeper carrier relationships and longer history with US carriers, which can translate to marginally better delivery on edge cases.
- Telnyx has been improving deliverability but some users report inconsistencies on certain routes, particularly for time-sensitive messages.
- International SMS: Both are competitive, but route quality varies by country and changes frequently.
Reliability and Uptime
This is where we need to be honest about Telnyx's recent track record.
Twilio
Twilio has generally maintained strong uptime over the years. They've had incidents (every platform does), but major outages are relatively rare. Their status page shows a solid track record with most months at 99.95%+ uptime for core APIs.
Telnyx
Telnyx had notable outages in December 2025 and February 2026 that affected voice and messaging services for multiple hours. These incidents shook confidence among some users, particularly those running mission-critical communications.
To Telnyx's credit, they were transparent about the incidents and published detailed post-mortems. The December outage was related to a network backbone issue, and the February incident involved a cascading failure in their media processing pipeline.
It's worth noting that owning your own infrastructure is a double-edged sword: you have more control, but when your network has an issue, you can't failover to another upstream provider the way a reseller can. Twilio, by contrast, can (and has) shifted traffic between carriers during outages.
Support Quality
Twilio
- Free tier: Email/ticket support with 24-48 hour response times
- Developer plan ($250/mo): Chat and phone support, 4-hour SLA for critical issues
- Business plan ($1,500/mo): Dedicated TAM, 1-hour SLA, proactive monitoring
- Extensive documentation, community forums, and Stack Overflow presence
Telnyx
- All accounts: 24/7 support via chat, email, and phone
- No paid support tiers — everyone gets the same access
- Response times vary — praised by some as responsive, criticized by others on Reddit as slow or unhelpful for complex issues
- Documentation is good but not as comprehensive as Twilio's
The Reddit criticism is worth noting: multiple threads from 2024-2025 mention frustration with Telnyx support on complex routing issues. However, other users report excellent experiences, so it appears inconsistent rather than universally poor.
Developer Experience
Twilio wins this category decisively:
- SDKs: Twilio has official SDKs in 7+ languages, all actively maintained. Telnyx has SDKs but they cover fewer languages and are less polished.
- Documentation: Twilio's docs are industry-leading — comprehensive, well-organized, with extensive code samples. Telnyx's docs are good but less detailed.
- Community: Twilio has millions of developers, active forums, Stack Overflow answers, and a massive content library. Telnyx's community is much smaller.
- No-code tools: Twilio Studio, Flex, and other visual builders have no direct Telnyx equivalent.
If developer experience is your primary concern and cost is secondary, Twilio remains the better choice.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Twilio | Telnyx |
|---|---|---|
| Voice API | ✅ | ✅ |
| SMS/MMS API | ✅ | ✅ |
| SIP Trunking | ✅ | ✅ (stronger) |
| Video | ✅ | ✅ (newer) |
| Email (SendGrid) | ✅ | ❌ |
| ✅ | ✅ | |
| Contact Center (Flex) | ✅ | ❌ |
| AI/ML Features | ✅ | ✅ (growing) |
| Number Lookup | ✅ | ✅ |
| Fax | ✅ | ✅ |
| IoT/SIM | ✅ | ✅ |
| Elastic SIP | ✅ | ✅ (stronger) |
When to Choose Twilio
- Developer experience and ecosystem are top priorities
- You need Twilio-specific products (Flex, Studio, Segment integration)
- Your team is already trained on Twilio APIs
- Cost is secondary to time-to-market
- You need the broadest possible feature set from one vendor
When to Choose Telnyx
- Voice costs are a significant portion of your communications spend
- You have international calling needs (UK, AU, IL, EU)
- You need elastic SIP trunking
- You want infrastructure-level control over your communications
- Budget optimization is more important than ecosystem breadth
The Best of Both Worlds: Hybrid Routing
You don't have to choose one or the other exclusively. Many businesses — including GoHighLevel agencies using TelnyxForGHL — run a hybrid setup:
- Voice through Telnyx: Capture the 47-78% savings on calls
- SMS through Twilio: Maintain your existing 10DLC registration and deliverability
- Failover capability: If one provider has an issue, the other can handle critical traffic
This is exactly what TelnyxForGHL enables for GoHighLevel agencies. Voice routes through Telnyx at wholesale rates, while SMS continues through LC Phone (Twilio). No porting, no migration, and you get the cost savings where they matter most.
The Verdict
Twilio is the safer, broader choice with a massive ecosystem and battle-tested reliability. You pay a premium for that, but you get the most comprehensive developer platform in communications.
Telnyx is the smarter choice for cost-conscious businesses, particularly those with significant voice volume or international traffic. The savings are real and substantial. The tradeoffs — smaller community, recent reliability hiccups, less polished developer experience — are real too.
For most businesses, the ideal approach isn't choosing one over the other — it's using each where they're strongest.
Running a GHL agency? Get the best of both.
TelnyxForGHL routes voice through Telnyx while keeping SMS on Twilio. Maximum savings, zero migration risk.
Calculate Your Savings